CC prpm-json-best-practices
Best practices for structuring prpm.json package manifests with required fields, tags, organization, multi-package management, enhanced file format, eager/lazy activation, and conversion hints
Best practices for structuring prpm.json package manifests with required fields, tags, organization, multi-package management, enhanced file format…
As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, consistency, execution cost
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 8751 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (prpm-json-best-practices) differs from the folder (prpm-json-best-practices-skill)
- 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 8751 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Steps. 154 steps, 9 vague phrases
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Failures and branches. 4 branches
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 19 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
- -216 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 192: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 81 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 154 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (50 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.