BC architecture-zoo
Choose a model architecture for a medical-imaging research question before scaffolding. Maps the task (classification, segmentation, detection, transfer), modality and dimensionality, labelled-data scale, and class imbalance to a shortlist of architectures, each grounded in its source paper with a when-to-use, a medical-imaging use, a reference implementation, the typical validation setup, and the matching model-scaffold template. Covers the foundational curriculum (ResNet, DenseNet, EfficientNet, ViT, Swin; U-Net, 3-D U-Net, Attention/Residual U-Net, nnU-Net (+ ResEnc/MedNeXt/STU-Net), Mask R-CNN; SAM/MedSAM, nnInteractive/VISTA3D interactive-3D, TotalSegmentator, BiomedCLIP, DINO/MAE/SimCLR; and graph neural nets — GCN/GraphSAGE/GAT/GIN/BrainGNN — for brain connectomes). It teaches archetypes and the task-to-architecture logic (including the "scale the CNN, new≠better" rigour caveat), not a live SOTA leaderboard.
Choose a model architecture for a medical-imaging research question before scaffolding.
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreferences/synthesis.md:25High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)- **Reference impl**: the official pyto…pix repo; `/model-scaffold
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "triggers" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools"
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 16 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1166 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 928: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 7)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.