CF manage-project
Research project management for medical manuscripts. Scaffold project structure, track writing progress across phases, maintain project memory files, generate submission checklists and backwards timelines. Commands: init, status, sync-memory, checklist, timeline.
Research project management for medical manuscripts.
As a process F 44/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: templates/SSOT.yaml.template, scripts/init_project.py, scripts/validate_project_contract.py
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/SSOT.yaml.template - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/init_project.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/validate_project_contract.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/migrate_project_to_ssot.py - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "triggers" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools" - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 20, 38, 56): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100
- 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: templates/SSOT.yaml.template, scripts/init_project.py, scripts/validate_project_contract.py
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 34 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2453 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 263: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 19 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 5)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.