SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CB polish-language

Academic English consistency linting and non-native (ESL) language polish for medical manuscripts. Deterministically flags abbreviation define-once violations, US/UK spelling drift, hyphen-vs-en-dash numeric ranges, P/p case, hyphenation variants, small-number style, and value/unit spacing, then guides a style-only clarity pass that never alters numbers, citations, or scientific meaning. Distinct from humanize (AI-tell removal) and check-reporting (guideline items).

Aperivue/medsci-skills Agent Skills author: Aperivue MIT 14 files · 6 scripts body ≈ 1 723 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 32 h ago

Academic English consistency linting and non-native (ESL) language polish for medical manuscripts.

As a process B 69/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice

AnalyzerResearchData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
69/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Running it twice w 4
30
When it triggers w 12
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"

Process rating: all ten parameters 69/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 31 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1723 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 470: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.