SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CF verify-refs

Audit-only verification of manuscript references against PubMed and CrossRef. Detects fabricated or mismatched citations and writes qc/reference_audit.json. Does not modify references/ or refs.bib.

Aperivue/medsci-skills Agent Skills author: Aperivue MIT 25 files · 15 scripts body ≈ 3 709 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 32 h ago

Audit-only verification of manuscript references against PubMed and CrossRef.

As a process F 54/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/verified_references.tsv, references/library.bib, scripts/validate_project_contract.py

AnalyzerWordResearchPersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
54/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/verified_references.tsv, references/library.bib, scripts/validate_project_contract.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 16. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/verified_references.tsv
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/library.bib
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/validate_project_contract.py
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/*
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"

Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/verified_references.tsv, references/library.bib, scripts/validate_project_contract.py
  • 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: references/verified_references.tsv, references/library.bib, scripts/validate_project_contract.py
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 39 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3709 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • -32 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 197: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.