SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC babysit-pr

Monitor a PR and fix CI or review feedback. Use standalone, or from /ship to continue through its authorized guarded merge instead of stopping at green.

BuilderIO/agent-native Agent Skills author: BuilderIO 1 file body ≈ 8 456 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Monitor a PR and fix CI or review feedback.

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, execution cost

AnalyzerGitHubSoftware developmentData and analyticsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 8456 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "scope"
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 247): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 94 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 8456 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, git) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Steps. 57 steps, 4 vague phrases
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
  • low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 152: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 12 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 57 items
  • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.