SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CD shadcn-ui

Project-aware shadcn/ui components, registry MCP, theming, and design-system lint feedback. Use when adding or changing React/Tailwind UI, a primitive, theme, registry, or component contract in an Agent-Native app.

BuilderIO/agent-native Agent Skills author: BuilderIO 1 file body ≈ 2 896 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 4 d ago

Project-aware shadcn/ui components, registry MCP, theming, and design-system lint feedback.

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: templates/plan/**

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: templates/plan/**
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 8 more places: agent-native, agent-native, agent-native, agent-native, agent-native, agent-native, agent-native, agent-native

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: templates/plan/**
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "scope"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "local-changes"

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: templates/plan/**
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: templates/plan/**
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 58 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2896 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 214: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 58 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.