SKILLEMALL.ai

CD review-latest-feedback

Review Slack, GitHub, CI, Sentry, Analytics, diagnostics, linked trackers, and app/template, desktop, and package deploy/release lanes. Answer reporters first; fix verified defects, verify delivery, build upvoted features, and recap. Use for scheduled or manual sweeps.

BuilderIO/agent-native Agent Skills author: BuilderIO 9 files body ≈ 5 974 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 7 h ago

Review Slack, GitHub, CI, Sentry, Analytics, diagnostics, linked trackers, and app/template, desktop, and package deploy/release lanes.

As a process D 38/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: references/ci-red-report.md, ...

AnalyzerSlackGitHubData and analyticsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
66
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
38/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: references/ci-red-report.md, ...
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: review-latest-feedback (BuilderIO/agent-native)

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5974 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/ci-red-report.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ...
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "scope"
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 92): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 38/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/ci-red-report.md, ...
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/ci-red-report.md, ...
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 24 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5974 tokens
  • 85Steps. 15 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -225 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 269: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 22 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 8)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.