AC capacitor-push-notifications
Sets up and debugs remote push in Capacitor apps with @capacitor/push-notifications (FCM on Android, APNs on iOS), or Capgo alternatives @capgo/capacitor-firebase-messaging and @capgo/capacitor-notifications. Covers APNs keys, Push Notifications capability, AppDelegate `didRegisterForRemoteNotificationsWithDeviceToken` forwarding (stays in AppDelegate under the Capacitor 8.5 UIScene lifecycle), Android 13+ POST_NOTIFICATIONS permission, notification channels and icons, `firebaseMessagingVersion`, foreground `presentationOptions` (Capacitor 9 removes iOS `alert`; use `banner`/`list`), and tap routing. Use when `registration` never fires, iOS returns an APNs token instead of an FCM token, errors like "no valid aps-environment entitlement string found" appear, or notifications do not show. Do not use for local-only notifications or deep link URL handling (capacitor-deep-linking), UIScene migration (capacitor-uiscene-migration), or log capture (ios-android-logs).
Sets up and debugs remote push in Capacitor apps with @capacitor/push-notifications (FCM on Android, APNs on iOS), or Capgo alternatives…
As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
The same skill appears in 1 more place: capgo-skills
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 88): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 34 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 34 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2182 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Description length 973: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.