AC capacitor-plugin-upgrade-v5-to-v6
Upgrades a Capacitor plugin library from v5 to v6 using `npx @capacitor/plugin-migration-v5-to-v6@latest`, then the manual checklist - `@capacitor/*` dev deps to `latest-6`, `compileSdkVersion` replaced by `compileSdk`, compile/target SDK 34 defaults, AGP 8.2.1, Gradle 8.2.1, Kotlin 1.9.10, plus code changes - `addListener` in `definitions.ts` returns only `Promise<PluginListenerHandle>` (drop `& PluginListenerHandle`), remove `CAP_PLUGIN_METHOD(removeAllListeners, ...)` from the `.m` file, and optional experimental SPM support via `Package.swift`. Use when a plugin targets Capacitor 5 and must support 6. Do not use for app upgrades, other major versions, or non-Capacitor libraries.
Upgrades a Capacitor plugin library from v5 to v6 using npx @capacitor/plugin-migration-v5-to-v6@latest, then the manual checklist - @capacitor/ dev deps to…
As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
The same skill appears in 1 more place: capgo-skills
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Broad scope
meta-dynamic-shellSKILL.md:28Shell command executed automatically when the skill loads (Claude Code !`cmd` preamble)!`node -e "const fs=require('fs');if(!fs.existsSync('package.json'))process.exit(0);const pkg=JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('package.json','utf8'));const out=['package.name='+(pkg.name||''),'package.vers -
low Broad scope
meta-dynamic-shellSKILL.md:31Shell command executed automatically when the skill loads (Claude Code !`cmd` preamble)!`find . -maxdepth 3 \( -path './example-app' -o -path './ios' -o -path './android' \)`
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 13 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1013 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 691: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.