SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC ionic-design

Builds and reviews Ionic Framework UI in Capacitor apps (Ionic 9 current, Ionic 8 still common) - page structure (`ion-header`/`ion-content`/`ion-footer`), lists, modern form syntax (`label`/`labelPlacement` on `ion-input`/`ion-select`), sheet modals, tabs + `ion-router-outlet`, CSS variable theming, dark palettes (`palettes/dark.system.css`, `.ion-palette-dark`), iOS vs MD mode, and Ionic 8 -> 9 breaking changes (React Router 6, Vue Router 5, Angular 18-22 zoneless, removed `ion-picker-legacy`, boolean `autocorrect`, `npx @ionic/migrate`). Use when writing Ionic components, theming an Ionic app, fixing platform-mode styling, or upgrading @ionic/react, @ionic/vue, @ionic/angular. Do not use for Konsta UI (konsta-ui), Tailwind setup (tailwind-capacitor), raw safe-area CSS (safe-area-handling), keyboard resize (capacitor-keyboard), or Ionic Appflow/Enterprise migrations (ionic-appflow-migration, ionic-enterprise-sdk-migration).

Cap-go/capgo-skills Agent Skills author: Cap-go 5 files body ≈ 1 467 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 8 h ago

Builds and reviews Ionic Framework UI in Capacitor apps (Ionic 9 current, Ionic 8 still common) - page structure (ion-header/ion-content/ion-footer), lists…

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

AnalyzerSoftware developmentData and analyticsDesigntype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: capgo-skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 46, 57): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, node) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 32 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1467 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Description length 939: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.