SKILLEMALL.ai

AB digital-human

Create and manage script- or audio-driven AI avatar videos from an official or saved presenter, an imported portrait, or a representative still prepared from video. Use for 数字人、数字分身、虚拟人、照片开口说话、人像口播、改稿不重拍, AI avatar, AI avatar video, avatar video, talking avatar, talking photo, photo avatar, video avatar, AI presenter, virtual presenter, virtual spokesperson, digital human, or a person's digital twin, including choosing or creating the avatar and deciding its voice, script, aspect ratio, and output quality. Do not use for a static profile-picture avatar, game or 3D character creation, an industrial digital twin, ordinary B-roll, generic image-to-video, video translation, talking-head editing, lip-sync dubbing alone, or TTS-only requests.

ChatCut-Inc/agent-plugin Agent Skills author: ChatCut-Inc 2 files body ≈ 4 027 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 19 h ago

Create and manage script- or audio-driven AI avatar videos from an official or saved presenter, an imported portrait, or a representative still prepared from…

As a process B 69/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting

GeneratorMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
69/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 3 more places: agent-plugin, agent-plugin, agent-plugin

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 69/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 20 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4027 tokens
    • 100Steps. 40 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 746: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.