SKILLEMALL.ai

BC 1c-query-optimization

Advanced query patterns for 1C: temporary tables, joins, DCS optimization. Use for complex queries beyond basic rules in query-optimization-tips.md.

Desko77/claude-code-skills-1c Agent Skills author: Desko77 MIT 2 files body ≈ 660 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Advanced query patterns for 1C: temporary tables, joins, DCS optimization.

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Obfuscation medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The files contain invisible characters, encoded commands or comments hidden from readers but visible to the model. What you read differs from what the agent sees.

For the author

Remove invisible characters (they usually sneak in through copy-paste) and encoded strings: no catalog will pass them. Instructions for the model must be readable by a human too.

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • medium Obfuscation uni-mixed-script-word SKILL.md:63
      Word mixing Latin and Cyrillic letters (homoglyph obfuscation) (1 occurrence)
      |	ЕСТЬNULL(Остатки.КоличествоОстаток, 0) КАК Остаток

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 7 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 660 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • medium 3 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +3Description length 148: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 7 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +2Bilingual instructions (RU + EN)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.