SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC 1c-vanessa-steps

Реестр шагов Vanessa Automation (BDD для 1С:Предприятие) - 1569 шагов с описаниями, поиск шага по смыслу и валидация готового сценария .feature. Используй ВСЕГДА, когда пишешь, правишь или проверяешь сценарии Vanessa на Gherkin: модель уверенно сочиняет шаги, которых в Vanessa нет, и такой сценарий падает только на прогоне. Триггеры: написать сценарий Vanessa, BDD-тест для 1С, feature-файл, Gherkin для 1С, какой шаг открывает форму, есть ли такой шаг, проверь сценарий, валидация feature, Turbo Gherkin, шаги Ванессы.

Desko77/claude-code-skills-1c Claude Code author: Desko77 MIT 10 files · 5 scripts body ≈ 1 434 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Реестр шагов Vanessa Automation (BDD для 1С:Предприятие) - 1569 шагов с описаниями, поиск шага по смыслу и валидация готового сценария .feature. Используй…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

Integration1CCommerceSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
90
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Obfuscation medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The files contain invisible characters, encoded commands or comments hidden from readers but visible to the model. What you read differs from what the agent sees.

For the author

Remove invisible characters (they usually sneak in through copy-paste) and encoded strings: no catalog will pass them. Instructions for the model must be readable by a human too.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 2

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 2
    • medium Obfuscation uni-mixed-script-word references/steps-compact.md:596
      Word mixing Latin and Cyrillic letters (homoglyph obfuscation) (6 occurrences)
      И я запоминаю элемент с типом "Тип" c родителем "$IDЭлемента$" в переменную "IDЭлемента" Vanessa Automation
    • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
      Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash
      allowed-tools: Bash Read Write Edit Glob

    Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 8 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1434 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -32 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +3Description length 521: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 8 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
    • +2Bilingual instructions (RU + EN)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.