SKILLEMALL.ai

CB 1c-web-test

Тестирование 1С через веб-клиент - автоматизация действий в браузере. Используй когда пользователь просит проверить, протестировать, автоматизировать действия в 1С через браузер

Desko77/claude-code-skills-1c Claude Code author: Desko77 MIT 8 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 5 546 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Тестирование 1С через веб-клиент - автоматизация действий в браузере.

As a process B 75/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice

Procedure1CPlaywrightData and analyticsMedia and videoSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
81/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
94
Quality 40%
62
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
75/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Result and completion w 14
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash
    allowed-tools: Bash Read Write Glob Grep
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token scripts/package-lock.json:17
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…uWm+fFRcIOgKBMiOBP+eXiy…9ab+DDKA==",
    detector

Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5546 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 75/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5546 tokens
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 27 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • -31 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +3Description length 177: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 56 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (33 code blocks)
  • +2Bilingual instructions (RU + EN)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 62.