SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC ai-edt-tools

EDT-based 1C:Enterprise (1С:Предприятие 8.3+) development via the EDT MCP server - BSL code analysis and editing, metadata inspection and construction, module navigation, query validation, managed forms, error checking, debugging, infobase update. Use when the project is an EDT workspace: 1C/BSL modules, .mdo metadata, 1C queries, managed forms. Not for 1C 7.7 (.1s/.ert/1Cv7.MD) and not for Configurator-format sources without an EDT project - those have their own skills.

Desko77/claude-code-skills-1c Agent Skills author: Desko77 MIT 9 files body ≈ 4 061 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

EDT-based 1C:Enterprise (1С:Предприятие 8.3+) development via the EDT MCP server - BSL code analysis and editing, metadata inspection and construction, module…

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: references/facades.md

Analyzer1CSoftware developmentAI and agentsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: references/facades.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/facades.md
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 136): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/facades.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/facades.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4061 tokens
  • 100Steps. 17 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium 3 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 475: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 7)
  • +2Bilingual instructions (RU + EN)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.