SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC create-technical-diagrams

创建、编辑、诊断并验收说明对象组成、连接、流程、状态、时序、接口或因果机制的技术图解与工程文档。用于说明/培训图、系统与网络拓扑、流程与 SFC、电气/仪控图、机械剖面、科学机制图及其可编辑原生源；按用途与 assurance 区分说明、培训、维护和受控工程声明，不用于以数值规律为主的数据图、保留真实地理位置的地图、产品工作台或参数仿真。

EverMind-AI/Raven Agent Skills author: EverMind-AI Apache-2.0 3 files body ≈ 1 774 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

创建、编辑、诊断并验收说明对象组成、连接、流程、状态、时序、接口或因果机制的技术图解与工程文档。用于说明/培训图、系统与网络拓扑、流程与 SFC、电气/仪控图、机械剖面、科学机制图及其可编辑原生源；按用途与 assurance…

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 28 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1774 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 170: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 10 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.