CC best-of-n
Generate bounded independent candidates, score them against a frozen rubric, and verify the selected result with a proof log.
Generate bounded independent candidates, score them against a frozen rubric, and verify the selected result with a proof log.
As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../../../guide/workflows/best-of-n.md, ../../claude-md/TESTING.md, ../../../guide/workflows/dynamic-workflows.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../guide/workflows/best-of-n.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../claude-md/TESTING.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../guide/workflows/dynamic-workflows.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../guide/workflows/tdd-with-claude.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../guide/roles/agent-evaluation.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../guide/workflows/code-review.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../guide/ops/ai-traceability.md - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "effort"
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Tools and files. 7 referenced file(s) missing: ../../../guide/workflows/best-of-n.md, ../../claude-md/TESTING.md, ../../../guide/workflows/dynamic-workflows.md
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 17 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1065 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 125: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 6 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 59.