SKILLEMALL.ai

BD cbioportal-database

Query cBioPortal for cancer genomics data including somatic mutations, copy number alterations, gene expression, and survival data across hundreds of cancer studies. Essential for cancer target validation, oncogene/tumor suppressor analysis, and patient-level genomic profiling.

FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills Agent Skills author: FreedomIntelligence 2 files body ≈ 3 175 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 14 h ago

Query cBioPortal for cancer genomics data including somatic mutations, copy number alterations, gene expression, and survival data across hundreds of cancer…

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureGitHubData and analyticsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token references/study_exploration.md:58
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (documentation table row)
      | `_rna…res` | RNA-seq z-scores relative to normals |
      table

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 85Steps. 26 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3175 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 278: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 19 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
    • +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.