BC pytdc
Therapeutics Data Commons. AI-ready drug discovery datasets (ADME, toxicity, DTI), benchmarks, scaffold splits, molecular oracles, for therapeutic ML and pharmacological prediction.
Therapeutics Data Commons.
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
The same skill appears in 1 more place: RA-Skills
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreferences/datasets.md:29High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- `CYP2…els` - CYP2C9 substrate (666 compounds)
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreferences/datasets.md:30High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- `CYP2…els` - CYP2D6 substrate (664 compounds)
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreferences/datasets.md:31High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- `CYP3…els` - CYP3A4 substrate (667 compounds)
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreferences/datasets.md:80High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- `SARS…eem` - In vitro screening (5,953 compounds)
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreferences/datasets.md:84High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- `M1_R…icz` - M1 receptor agonist (1,700 compounds)
quoted
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 85Steps. 67 steps, 3 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3106 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 181: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 43 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 67 items
- +4Has examples (24 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.