SKILLEMALL.ai

CC tooluniverse-antibody-engineering

Comprehensive antibody engineering and optimization for therapeutic development. Covers humanization, affinity maturation, developability assessment, and immunogenicity prediction. Use when asked to optimize antibodies, humanize sequences, or engineer therapeutic antibodies from lead to clinical candidate.

FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills Agent Skills author: FreedomIntelligence 8 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 12 738 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 15 h ago

Comprehensive antibody engineering and optimization for therapeutic development.

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, execution cost

ProcedureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:1364
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)
    **Variant**: VH_H…_v3

Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 12738 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 12738 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 85Steps. 87 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 307: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 61 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 87 items
  • +4Has examples (30 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.