SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BB tooluniverse-chemical-compound-retrieval

Retrieves chemical compound information from PubChem and ChEMBL with disambiguation, cross-referencing, and quality assessment. Creates comprehensive compound profiles with identifiers, properties, bioactivity, and drug information. Use when users need chemical data, drug information, or mention PubChem CID, ChEMBL ID, SMILES, InChI, or compound names.

FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills Agent Skills author: FreedomIntelligence 3 files body ≈ 2 195 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 12 h ago

Retrieves chemical compound information from PubChem and ChEMBL with disambiguation, cross-referencing, and quality assessment.

As a process B 72/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

ProcedureWriting and documentsData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
72/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:307
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (documentation table row)
      | `PubC…CID` | Structure visualization |
      table

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 72/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 29 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2195 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 354: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 28 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 29 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.