BC tooluniverse-crispr-screen-analysis
Comprehensive CRISPR screen analysis for functional genomics. Analyze pooled or arrayed CRISPR screens (knockout, activation, interference) to identify essential genes, synthetic lethal interactions, and drug targets. Perform sgRNA count processing, gene-level scoring (MAGeCK, BAGEL), quality control, pathway enrichment, and drug target prioritization. Use for CRISPR screen analysis, gene essentiality studies, synthetic lethality detection, functional genomics, drug target validation, or identifying genetic vulnerabilities.
Comprehensive CRISPR screen analysis for functional genomics.
As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 7758 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 7758 tokens
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 36 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 529: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 21 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
- +4Has examples (19 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.