SKILLEMALL.ai

BC tooluniverse-epigenomics

Production-ready genomics and epigenomics data processing for BixBench questions. Handles methylation array analysis (CpG filtering, differential methylation, age-related CpG detection, chromosome-level density), ChIP-seq peak analysis (peak calling, motif enrichment, coverage stats), ATAC-seq chromatin accessibility, multi-omics integration (expression + methylation correlation), and genome-wide statistics. Pure Python computation (pandas, scipy, numpy, pysam, statsmodels) plus ToolUniverse annotation tools (Ensembl, ENCODE, SCREEN, JASPAR, ReMap, RegulomeDB, ChIPAtlas). Supports BED, BigWig, methylation beta-value matrices, Illumina manifest files, and multi-sample clinical data. Use when processing methylation data, ChIP-seq peaks, ATAC-seq signals, or answering questions about CpG sites, differential methylation, chromatin accessibility, histone marks, or epigenomic statistics.

FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills Agent Skills author: FreedomIntelligence 5 files · 1 script body ≈ 13 442 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 15 h ago

Production-ready genomics and epigenomics data processing for BixBench questions.

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, execution cost, running it twice

ProcedureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 13442 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 13442 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 85Steps. 72 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +3Description length 894: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +4Structure: 52 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 72 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (25 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.