SKILLEMALL.ai

AD tooluniverse-statistical-modeling

Perform statistical modeling and regression analysis on biomedical datasets. Supports linear regression, logistic regression (binary/ordinal/multinomial), mixed-effects models, Cox proportional hazards survival analysis, Kaplan-Meier estimation, and comprehensive model diagnostics. Extracts odds ratios, hazard ratios, confidence intervals, p-values, and effect sizes. Designed to solve BixBench statistical reasoning questions involving clinical/experimental data. Use when asked to fit regression models, compute odds ratios, perform survival analysis, run statistical tests, or interpret model coefficients from provided data.

FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills Agent Skills author: FreedomIntelligence 15 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 4 738 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 11 h ago

Perform statistical modeling and regression analysis on biomedical datasets.

As a process D 44/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
44/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 15. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 483): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Steps. 70 steps, 4 vague phrases
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4738 tokens
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -215 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 630: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 34 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 70 items
    • +4Has examples (19 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.