SKILLEMALL.ai

BC prepare-walkthrough-presentation

Transforms validated /linear-walkthrough artifacts into one presentation-ready deck outline per major codebase component. Use when the user asks to create a presentation, prepare a walkthrough deck, build an onboarding deck, produce an architecture review deck, or summarize a codebase for a technical audience. Requires walkthrough directory output -- reads unified walkthrough, per-section files, validation reports, coverage maps, entry points, and open questions -- then orchestrates four parallel agent phases to produce slide outlines with speaker notes, evidence references, and suggested visuals.

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills Claude Code author: Jamie-BitFlight MIT 3 files body ≈ 2 154 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 8 d ago

Transforms validated /linear-walkthrough artifacts into one presentation-ready deck outline per major codebase component.

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../../../rules/large-file-write-strategy.md

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: ../../../rules/large-file-write-strategy.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../../rules/large-file-write-strategy.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../../rules/large-file-write-strategy.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../../../rules/large-file-write-strategy.md
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 38 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2154 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 604: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 25 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.