SKILLEMALL.ai

CD test-reviewer

Review existing tests against the software and contracts they actually exercise. Use to assess whether a test has justified unique protection, detects consequential faults, tolerates valid refactors, earns its lifecycle cost, or deserves strengthening, replacement, consolidation, or removal consideration. Reviews are read-only and evidence-backed, including TDD and regression tests.

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills Agent Skills author: Jamie-BitFlight MIT 9 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 1 613 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Review existing tests against the software and contracts they actually exercise.

As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/testing-principles.md, ../test-failure-mindset/SKILL.md, ../root-cause-tracing-process/SKILL.md

AnalyzerData and analyticsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
39/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/testing-principles.md, ../test-failure-mindset/SKILL.md, ../root-cause-tracing-process/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../docs/testing-principles.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../test-failure-mindset/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../root-cause-tracing-process/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../test-designer/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../dh-meta-docs/SKILL.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/testing-principles.md, ../test-failure-mindset/SKILL.md, ../root-cause-tracing-process/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 5 referenced file(s) missing: ../../docs/testing-principles.md, ../test-failure-mindset/SKILL.md, ../root-cause-tracing-process/SKILL.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 6 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1613 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 385: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 4 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.