SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD plugin-settings

Per-project plugin configuration via .local.md files — covers the .claude/plugin-name.local.md pattern for storing user-configurable settings with YAML frontmatter and markdown body. Use when implementing plugin settings, reading YAML frontmatter from hooks, creating configuration-driven behavior, managing agent state files, or adding per-project plugin configuration. Covers file structure, parsing techniques, common patterns (temporarily active hooks, agent state management, configuration-driven behavior), security considerations, and best practices.

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills Agent Skills author: Jamie-BitFlight MIT 3 files body ≈ 1 760 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 8 d ago

Per-project plugin configuration via .local.md files — covers the .claude/plugin-name.local.md pattern for storing user-configurable settings with YAML…

As a process D 40/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
40/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 232): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 40/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 75Steps. 3 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1760 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 557: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
    • +4Has examples (16 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.