SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF analyze-test-failures

Analyze specific pytest failures using authoritative contracts and a cited product/test evidence chain. Use for failing test names or pytest output, distinguishing product, interface, oracle, and harness defects without automatically changing expectations or forcing an architectural redesign.

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills Claude Code author: Jamie-BitFlight MIT 1 file body ≈ 577 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 8 d ago

Analyze specific pytest failures using authoritative contracts and a cited product/test evidence chain.

As a process F 29/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: ../test-failure-mindset/SKILL.md, ../comprehensive-test-review/SKILL.md

AnalyzerData and analyticsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
29/100
No process to follow
References files that are not bundled: ../test-failure-mindset/SKILL.md, ../comprehensive-test-review/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Steps w 15
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../test-failure-mindset/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../comprehensive-test-review/SKILL.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 29/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../test-failure-mindset/SKILL.md, ../comprehensive-test-review/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: ../test-failure-mindset/SKILL.md, ../comprehensive-test-review/SKILL.md
  • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 577 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 293: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 3 headings
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.