BD async-python-patterns
Use when writing asyncio Python code — async/await coroutines, concurrent I/O with asyncio.gather, task creation and cancellation, semaphore rate limiting, producer-consumer queues, async context managers, async generators, WebSocket servers, aiohttp web scraping, async database operations, run_in_executor for blocking calls, or testing async code with pytest-asyncio. Covers FastAPI and aiohttp patterns, synchronization primitives, timeout handling, and common pitfalls like event loop blocking and missing await.
gather, task creation and cancellation, semaphore rate limiting, producer-consumer queues, async context managers, async generators, WebSocket servers…
As a process D 44/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4581 tokens
- 100Steps. 27 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 517: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 38 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
- +4Has examples (23 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.