SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC orchestrate

Use when implementing a Python feature, adding CLI commands, writing pytest suites, reviewing Python code, debugging, or refactoring. The primary Python engineering workflow orchestrator — classifies the task and delegates through this plugin's own specialist agents (architect → implement → test → review), sized to the task. Delegates to python-cli-architect (implementation), python-pytest-architect (tests), code-reviewer (review), python-cli-design-spec (architecture). Triggers on any Python task requiring specialist agent coordination or multi-agent execution.

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills Claude Code author: Jamie-BitFlight MIT 2 files body ≈ 1 364 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 8 d ago

The primary Python engineering workflow orchestrator — classifies the task and delegates through this plugin's own specialist agents (architect → implement →…

As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting

IntegrationSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
62/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 21): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 25 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1364 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 568: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.