SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC optimize

Use when the primary outcome is refining an existing AI-facing artifact without dropping behavior, including SKILL.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, rules, prompts, and agent definitions that need sharper invocation, structure, or completion criteria.

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills Agent Skills author: Jamie-BitFlight MIT 1 file body ≈ 1 020 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 8 d ago

md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, rules, prompts, and agent definitions that need sharper invocation, structure, or completion criteria.

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../the-rewrite-room/references/supporting-skills.md, ../the-rewrite-room/references/writing-contract.md

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: ../the-rewrite-room/references/supporting-skills.md, ../the-rewrite-room/references/writing-contract.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../the-rewrite-room/references/supporting-skills.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../the-rewrite-room/references/writing-contract.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../the-rewrite-room/references/supporting-skills.md, ../the-rewrite-room/references/writing-contract.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: ../the-rewrite-room/references/supporting-skills.md, ../the-rewrite-room/references/writing-contract.md
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 19 steps
  • 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1020 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 243: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 5 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.