AC hugging-science
Discovers and evaluates scientific datasets, models, methodology posts, and Spaces through the Hugging Science catalog. Used when selecting scientific ML resources in biology, chemistry, genomics, materials, climate, physics, astronomy, medicine, mathematics, protein design, single-cell analysis, or PDE modeling, and when checking their actual datasets, Transformers, native-runtime, Inference Providers, or Gradio interfaces.
Discovers and evaluates scientific datasets, models, methodology posts, and Spaces through the Hugging Science catalog.
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 85Steps. 23 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2749 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 428: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.
In the sandbox Скрипты не запустились
The skill's scripts were run in a throwaway machine: no network, fake keys in the home directory, a tracer watching. We wrote down what they did. Reaching for the network or for secrets caps the technical grade at C; a quiet run adds no points.
Запущено 1 скрипт; каждому дали двадцать секунд, поддельный домашний каталог с ключами и сеть, в которой ничего нет.
Ни один не дошёл до работы — им не хватило зависимостей, аргументов или файлов. Это не отзыв о поведении: наблюдать было не за чем.
scripts/fetch_catalog.py | не запустился: fetch_catalog.py: error: the following arguments are required: cmd |
5 Oct 2026