SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD neuropixels-analysis

Analyzes Neuropixels extracellular recordings end-to-end with SpikeInterface. Covers loading SpikeGLX/Open Ephys/NWB data, preprocessing, drift/motion correction, Kilosort4 (and CPU) spike sorting, quality metrics, and unit curation (threshold-based, model-based UnitRefine, and AI-assisted visual review). Use when working with Neuropixels 1.0/2.0 recordings, spike sorting, or extracellular electrophysiology analysis.

K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills Agent Skills author: K-Dense-AI MIT 19 files · 8 scripts body ≈ 4 766 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 13 h ago

Analyzes Neuropixels extracellular recordings end-to-end with SpikeInterface.

As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerGitHubData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
47/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 19. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 165, 196, 199): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4766 tokens
    • 85Steps. 34 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -31 of 7 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 420: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 36 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
    • +4Has examples (21 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (10 of 10)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.