SKILLEMALL.ai

BD torch-geometric

Supports PyTorch Geometric (PyG) graph neural networks — node/link/graph classification, message passing (GCN, GAT, GraphSAGE, GIN), heterogeneous graphs, neighbor sampling, and custom datasets. Use when working with torch_geometric, not for general NetworkX analytics or non-graph PyTorch models.

K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills Agent Skills author: K-Dense-AI MIT 8 files body ≈ 5 434 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 11 h ago

Supports PyTorch Geometric (PyG) graph neural networks — node/link/graph classification, message passing (GCN, GAT, GraphSAGE, GIN), heterogeneous graphs…

As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
45/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5434 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 17): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python, node) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5434 tokens
  • 85Steps. 33 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 297: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 23 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
  • +4Has examples (19 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 7)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.