BD venue-templates
Prepares journal manuscripts, conference papers, research posters, and grant documents using venue-specific formatting guidance and bundled LaTeX scaffolds. Supports selecting an official template, checking current page or anonymity rules, adapting academic writing to a venue, or inspecting a submission PDF.
Prepares journal manuscripts, conference papers, research posters, and grant documents using venue-specific formatting guidance and bundled LaTeX scaffolds.
As a process D 40/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: assets/journals/nature_article.tex, assets/journals/plos_one.tex, assets/journals/neurips_article.tex
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 20. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/journals/nature_article.tex - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/journals/plos_one.tex - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/journals/neurips_article.tex - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/journals/elsarticle-template-num.tex - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/journals/elsarticle-template-num-names.tex - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/journals/elsarticle-template-harv.tex - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/journals/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/grants/nsf_proposal_template.tex - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/grants/nih_specific_aims.tex - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/posters/beamerposter_academic.tex
Process rating: all ten parameters 40/100
- 0Tools and files. 10 referenced file(s) missing: assets/journals/nature_article.tex, assets/journals/plos_one.tex, assets/journals/neurips_article.tex
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 100Steps. 69 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3169 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 309: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 25 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 69 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (12 of 12)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.