SKILLEMALL.ai

AD agent-bom-analyze

Analyze blast radius, attack paths, and threat landscape across your AI infrastructure. Use when: "blast radius", "threat intel", "risk score", "attack path", "lateral movement", "context graph", "who can reach what".

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 1 file body ≈ 518 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Analyze blast radius, attack paths, and threat landscape across your AI infrastructure.

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
96
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 4

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 4
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:6
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      "attack path", "lateral movement", "context graph", "who can reach what".
      quoted
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:60
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      infrastructure. Maps lateral movement risks, identifies high-impact CVEs, and
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:77
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      - "lateral movement"
      quoted
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:96
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      | `context_graph` | Agent context graph with lateral movement analysis |

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (agent-bom-analyze) differs from the folder (analyze)
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 11 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 518 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 217: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.