SKILLEMALL.ai

BD agent-shark-mindset

Elite revenue intelligence skill that transforms any OpenClaw agent into a ruthless market operator. Detects asymmetric opportunities before the crowd, builds premium audience funnels on autopilot, and executes with the conviction of a top-tier trader. Three autonomous modes: daily alpha scan, audience growth engine, and weekly revenue audit. Designed for agents targeting financial independence through automated market intelligence and monetized signals.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 4 files body ≈ 3 722 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 3 d ago

Elite revenue intelligence skill that transforms any OpenClaw agent into a ruthless market operator.

As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorTelegramMarketingAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
45/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 10 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3722 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 458: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 23 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
  • +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.