AF app-store-optimization
App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklists, and tracking ranking changes.
App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on…
As a process F 49/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../content-creator/, ../marketing-demand-acquisition/, ../marketing-strategy-pmm/
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 18. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../content-creator/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../marketing-demand-acquisition/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../marketing-strategy-pmm/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "triggers"
Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: ../content-creator/, ../marketing-demand-acquisition/, ../marketing-strategy-pmm/
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 138 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3987 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 532: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 37 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 138 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
- +3All 8 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.