SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD autoforge

AutoForge is a production-grade autonomous optimization framework for AI agents. It replaces subjective "reflection" with mathematically rigorous convergence loops — tracking every iteration in TSV, cross-validating with multiple models, and stopping only when pass rates confirm real improvement. Four specialized modes: prompt (skill & doc optimization via scenario simulation), code (sandboxed test execution with measurable criteria), audit (CLI verification against live tool behavior), and project (whole-repo cross-file consistency analysis). Battle-tested across 50+ iterations on production skills. Use when: user says "autoforge", "forge", "optimize skill", "improve", "run autoforge", "optimize code", "improve script", "optimize repo", "forge project", "check project", "repo audit".

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 9 files · 1 script body ≈ 4 983 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

AutoForge is a production-grade autonomous optimization framework for AI agents.

As a process D 42/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerDockerSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
94
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
42/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Dangerous commands cmd-pipe-to-shell-known-host references/ml-mode.md:21
      Pipe-to-shell installer from a well-known host (still executes remote code) (documentation of a security skill)
      curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
      security skill

    Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 42/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4983 tokens
    • 100Steps. 92 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -218 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 11 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 795: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 45 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 92 items
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 94.