SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC content-strategy

When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions "content strategy," "what should I write about," "content ideas," "blog strategy," "topic clusters," or "content planning." For writing individual pieces, see copywriting. For SEO-specific audits, see seo-audit.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 4 files body ≈ 1 287 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover.

As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, failures and branches, consistency

AnalyzerMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
64/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: content-strategy (LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (content-strategy) differs from the folder (cs-content-strategy)
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 85Steps. 43 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1287 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 358: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 43 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.