SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF seo-audit

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," or "SEO health check." For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 4 files body ≈ 1 406 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site.

As a process F 46/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/ai-writing-detection.md, references/aeo-geo-patterns.md

AnalyzerMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
46/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/ai-writing-detection.md, references/aeo-geo-patterns.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: seo-audit (LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills)

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/ai-writing-detection.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/aeo-geo-patterns.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/ai-writing-detection.md, references/aeo-geo-patterns.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/ai-writing-detection.md, references/aeo-geo-patterns.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (seo-audit) differs from the folder (cs-seo-audit)
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 85Steps. 58 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1406 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +4No input/output examples
  • -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 350: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 12 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 58 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.