AC csv-documentation-generator
Use when generating computer system validation (CSV) documentation for pharmaceutical and medical device industries, including validation plans, URS, FS, IQ/OQ/PQ documents, and traceability matrices.
Use when generating computer system validation (CSV) documentation for pharmaceutical and medical device industries, including validation plans, URS, FS…
As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice, progress reporting
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 59. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 6143 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "triggers" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "repository" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "bugs" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "createdAt" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "lastReviewedAt" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "validationStatus" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "requiredTools" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "inputSchema" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "outputSchema" - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 181): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 17 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6143 tokens
- 85Steps. 68 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -38 of 10 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 200: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 54 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 68 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (29 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.