SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB decision-mental-models

Apply the most relevant mental models (First Principles, Inversion, Second-Order Thinking, Occam's Razor, and 16 others) to any problem or decision, surfaces non-obvious insights by explicitly matching and working through 2-3 models per query.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 3 files body ≈ 6 857 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Apply the most relevant mental models (First Principles, Inversion, Second-Order Thinking, Occam's Razor, and 16 others) to any problem or decision, surfaces…

As a process B 75/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
75/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 6857 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

Process rating: all ten parameters 75/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6857 tokens
  • 85Steps. 31 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 243: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 36 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.