SKILLEMALL.ai

AC deepread-pii

Redact PII from documents before sharing or sending to LLMs. 14 PII types (names, SSN, credit cards, medical records, etc.) detected with context-aware AI — not regex. Knows patient vs. doctor, personal vs. institutional. Black bar redaction on PDFs, scanned images, and text files. Free tier: 2,000 pages/month.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 3 files body ≈ 4 914 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Redact PII from documents before sharing or sending to LLMs.

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ProcedureData and analyticsAI and agentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 3, column 14: description: Redact PII from documents before sharing or sending to LLMs. 14 PI… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "title"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4914 tokens
    • 100Steps. 62 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 312: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 46 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 62 items
    • +4Has examples (25 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.