SKILLEMALL.ai

AD didit-verification-management

Full Didit identity verification platform management — account creation, API keys, sessions, workflows, questionnaires, users, billing, blocklist, and webhooks. Use when someone needs to create a Didit account, get API keys, set up verification workflows, create or retrieve verification sessions, approve or decline sessions, manage users, check credit balance, top up credits, configure blocklists, configure webhooks programmatically, handle webhook signatures, or perform any platform administration. 45+ endpoints across 9 categories.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 5 files body ≈ 7 151 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Full Didit identity verification platform management — account creation, API keys, sessions, workflows, questionnaires, users, billing, blocklist, and webhooks.

As a process D 44/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationSoftware developmentData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
44/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 7151 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 51 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 7151 tokens
  • 85Steps. 10 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 539: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 63 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
  • +4Has examples (61 code blocks)
  • +3All 3 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.