SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC smart-email-agent

All-in-one Gmail agent for OpenClaw. Fuses email-reader, email-organizer, email-analyzer, email-responder, email-scheduler, and email-reporter into a single skill with token-optimizer integration and a self-improvement engine. Use this skill for ANYTHING email-related: checking inbox, searching messages, organizing labels, classifying/prioritizing, drafting replies, scheduling automation, generating reports, or reviewing costs. Triggers on: correo, email, inbox, bandeja, spam, draft, borrador, responder, organizar, etiquetar, archivar, informe, estadísticas, notificame, automatiza, revisar mensajes, prioriza, cuanto cuesta, presupuesto, mejora el agente. Requires: gog CLI (primary) or Gmail API Python scripts (fallback).

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 8 files body ≈ 4 258 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

All-in-one Gmail agent for OpenClaw.

As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

IntegrationGmailAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
50/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (smart-email-agent) differs from the folder (emailagy)
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4258 tokens
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 16 steps

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 730: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 44 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
    • +4Has examples (29 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.