SKILLEMALL.ai

BC find-skills-combo

Discover and recommend **combinations** of agent skills to complete complex, multi-faceted tasks. Provides two recommendation strategies — **Maximum Quality** (best skill per subtask) and **Minimum Dependencies** (fewest installs). Use this skill whenever the user wants to find skills, asks "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", or describes a task that likely requires multiple capabilities working together. Also use when the user mentions composing workflows, building pipelines, or needs help across several domains at once — even if they only say "find me a skill". This skill supersedes simple single-skill search by decomposing the task into subtasks and assembling an optimal skill portfolio.

Not recommendedcritical or high security findings
LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 2 files body ≈ 4 394 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 28 h ago

Discover and recommend combinations of agent skills to complete complex, multi-faceted tasks.

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureInfrastructureAI and agentsData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
82
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.

Obfuscation
If you install

The files contain invisible characters, encoded commands or comments hidden from readers but visible to the model. What you read differs from what the agent sees.

For the author

Remove invisible characters (they usually sneak in through copy-paste) and encoded strings: no catalog will pass them. Instructions for the model must be readable by a human too.

How to improve

  1. Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

  • high Obfuscation uni-zero-width SKILL.md:251
    Zero-width / invisible characters (possible hidden text) (4 occurrences)
    ␀```bash

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 9 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4394 tokens
  • 85Steps. 86 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 702: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 86 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.