BB goplaces-togo
Ask the user for their Google saved places list, look up each place with goplaces, and recommend the single best one to visit today based on their preferences and visit history.
Ask the user for their Google saved places list, look up each place with goplaces, and recommend the single best one to visit today based on their preferences…
As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4383 tokens
- 100Steps. 62 steps
- 100Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Failures and branches. 13 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
- low The response is described with custom markup (8 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 177: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 23 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 62 items
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.