AB has-anonymizer
HaS (Hide and Seek) on-device text and image anonymization. Text: 8 languages (zh/en/fr/de/es/pt/ja/ko), open-set entity types. Image: 21 privacy categories (face, fingerprint, ID card, passport, license plate, etc.). Use when: (1) anonymizing text before sending to cloud LLMs then restoring the response, (2) anonymizing documents, code, emails, or messages before sharing, (3) scanning text or images for sensitive content, (4) anonymizing logs before handing to ops/support, (5) masking faces/IDs/plates in photos before publishing or sharing.
HaS (Hide and Seek) on-device text and image anonymization.
As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 33. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 72 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3861 tokens
- low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
- low The response is described with custom markup (9 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- -34 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 547: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 25 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 72 items
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.